Posts tagged environmentalism.

newyorker:

The Food At Our Feet: Why is Foraging All the Rage?

I spent the summer foraging, like an early hominid with clothes. It didn’t matter that the first thing I learned about that daunting pastime of hunter-gatherers and visionary chefs was that nature’s bounty is a thorny gift. Thorny, or, if you prefer, spiny, prickly, buggy, sticky, slimy, muddy, and, occasionally, so toxic that one of the books I consulted for my summer forays carried a disclaimer absolving the publisher of responsibility should I happen to end up in the hospital or, worse, in the ground, moldering next to the Amanita phalloides that I’d mistaken for a porcini. I was not deterred.

- Jane Kramer examines the pursuit of wild food w/ René Redzepi, of Copenhagen’s Noma, “the best restaurant in the world”: http://nyr.kr/rNPHY0

I’ve been to this beach

(via loveandzombies)

(via postponelife)

Discovering Urbanism: Michael Sandel on public places ›

vicexversa:

An interesting talk about public spaces seen from the views of Michael Sandel, a Harvard political philosopher.

This is awesome and very similar to what my senior thesis was on.

I wonder if the decline of walking will lead to a decline of the creative process.

Malcolm Cowley (via theparisreview)

Because everybody knows that people who cannot walk - for one reason or another - simply have no creative bones in their bodies. Nope. No sir. /sarcasm

(via jemimaaslana)

Are you accusing the quote of saying that you have to be a walker to be creative?

The author was asked if he has any mnemonic devices that help his creative process. He said that a lot of people use walking and then said the quoted sentence. It doesn’t at all imply that people who can’t or don’t walk can’t be creative too. It’s just that walking contributes to overall creativity, and if one of those contributing factors declines then the sum total declines as well.

Like some people prefer eating apples and some don’t. If apples were to go extinct it would make sense that the overall fruit consumption would decline, if only for a little while, even though eating apples is not the only way to eat fruit. Some people will still eat fruit even if apples declined, just like some people would still be creative if walking declined.

(via jemimaaslana)

I wonder if the decline of walking will lead to a decline of the creative process.

sprnvasidr:

Think As Green - Featuring AbdulNasir Jangda

The ‘Environmentalism Issue’ is not a ‘Western concept’. It is also an ‘Islamic concept’. 
It starts with awareness. We gotta talk about it. 

sprnvasidr:

Cities pursuing sustainability, livability and more with “complete streets”

urbanation:

plantedcity:

From The Washington Post:

For the past century, city streets have been designed to ease automobile traffic flow. But in recent years, sustainability and livability have become buzz words as policymakers seek ways to reduce congestion and pollution and improve the health of residents. They have become increasingly aware that getting more people on the street boosts public safety, raises property value and brings in more businesses.

In and around Los Angeles, where cars outnumber people on the streets and freeways and multi-lane roads divide neighborhoods, efforts are under way to reverse the refrain “Nobody Walks In LA” that was sung by the 1980s band Missing Persons. They include a plan to make over Figueroa Street, a major downtown artery for vehicle traffic, for pedestrians, cyclists and transit riders.

The shift toward building “complete streets” reflects a broader change in federal government policy. Last year, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued new guidelines that moved to end “favoring motorized transportation at the expense of non-motorized” by including cyclist and pedestrian needs in new road projects.

Check out the rest of the article here

(Image credit: GOOD)

It’s about time we start moving away from this auto-mobile oriented design for cities. Human scale is back in walkability, which is the best way to be more sustainable because it invites individuals out of their cars into more environmentally forms of transportation (walking, biking, etc.) . Now this needs to be a massive revolution in Urban Design. 

As someone who’s both community organized for Complete Streets and has bike commuted for over ten years, I’d say that this is awesome.

(via sprnvasidra)

As clothes have become cheaper, our clothing consumption has gone through the roof. In 1930, the average American woman owned an average of nine outfits. Today, we each buy more than 60 pieces of new clothing on average per year. Our closets are larger and more stuffed than ever, as we’ve traded quality and style for low prices and trend-chasing. In the face of these irresistible deals, our total spending on clothing has actually increased, from $7.82 billion spent on apparel in 1950 to $375 billion today.

“The History of the Cheap Dress”, on Etsy

A fascinating and brief history of the rise of cheap clothes. Focused on women, but men can learn much from it, too. Two of the key results of this trend are a glut of clothes on the second-hand market and too many people impulse buying cheap clothes they don’t need.

(via putthison)

Concept train plans to save time and energy by never stopping ›

mohandaskgandhi:

Beekeeper Who Leaked EPA Documents: “I Don’t Think We Can Survive This Winter”

Colorado beekeeper Tom Theobald never expected to become embroiled in a controversy between the EPA and the pesticide industry. But that’s exactly what happened when Theobald got hold of an EPA document revealing that the agency is allowing the widespread use of a bee-toxic pesticide, in spite of warnings from EPA scientists.

So how did Theobald (pictured above) end up with such a contentious document?

Bayer, the corporation behind clothianidin (the pesticide in question), published a life cycle study about it in 2006 at the EPA’s request. The study was flawed—test and control fields were, for example, planted as close as 968 feet apart. But the EPA continued to allow the use of clothianidin, which has been on the market since 2003 for use on corn, canola, soy, sugar beets, sunflowers, and wheat (and which has been banned by Germany, France, Italy, and Slovenia for its toxic effects on bees, birds, and other species).

Fast forward to this year. Theobald wrote an article in the July issue of Bee Culture about clothianidin. Then an employee at the EPA called Theobald to tell him the article had led the EPA to review the pesticide’s original life cycle study before approving clothianidin for use on cotton and mustard. 

“They told me that EPA scientists had reviewed the original lifecycle study and determined it wasn’t scientifically sound, and I asked if it had been documented, if there was a hard copy,” he says, “The [employee] said yes, and I asked if I could get a copy.” And just like that, he had the proof he needed that the EPA had overlooked something that could be killing America’s bees.

“Everybody is keyed on the leaked memo, but basically it’s a public document,” adds Theobald. He just happened to be the first one to learn about it and ask for it. “The shock was that they did the study at all.”

Theobald has been concerned about clothianidin since it was first released in 2003. The pesticide is a neonicotinoid—a type of insecticide that disrupts the central nervous system of insects. Imidacloprid, the first neonicotinoid to be released in the U.S., came on the market in 1994, and began raising red flags soon after. France banned imidacloprid in 2003 due to concerns of bee die-off triggered by the substance.

Now the stakes are higher than ever. Tom Theobald’s honey crop this year is the smallest he’s seen in 35 years of beekeeping. “This is the critical winter for the beekeeping industry. I don’t think we can survive,” he says. “If the beekeeping industry collapses, it jeopardizes a third of American agriculture.”

That’s because the giant agriculture industry couldn’t produce nearly as much with native bee pollinators alone; instead, the industry relies on beekeepers, who rent out their bees to pollinate everything from strawberries and blueberries to squash and cucumbers.

As of today, the EPA has no plans to ban clothianidin in the U.S. Theobald hopes that all the press surrounding the issue will trigger the agency to change its mind. It has to, he says. “The EPA management needs to step forward, face the music, take its lumps and do things right. If they continue to try to bury this, they’re going to look more pathetic than they do already.”

Earlier: Wik-Bee Leaks: EPA Document Shows It Knowingly Allowed Pesticide That Kills Honey Bees

You too can add to the public pressure felt by the EPA. - And it IS effective!

(via custerdiedforyoursins)

There’s this one quote from an environmental ethics paper I really like, but I can’t remember the exact wording, the author, or the article title.

Basically the author showed how difficult it can be to offer moral reasons to preserve the environment and instead advocated a sort of virtue ethical framework. She brought up a passage from Kant* where he said that some actions are not immoral, but we can still judge them as not-beautiful.

Anyways, the quote was something like “Perhaps we could do with fewer moral actions and more beautiful ones.”

*Kant’s outdated example was to say that kicking a dog is not immoral, but it lacks beauty/virtue.

wherethewoollythingsare:

Rick MacPherson - Coral Reef Alliance (via avillago78) - a great speech - and check out the HUGE knitted coral reef in the background!

realvermin:

“The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals, or collectively: the land.
This sounds simple: do we not already sing our love for and obligation to the land of the free and the home of the brave? Yes, but just what and whom do we love? Certainly not the soil, which we are sending helter-skelter downriver. Certainly not the waters, which we assume have no function except to turn turbines, float barges, and carry off sewage. Certainly not the plants, of which we exterminate whole communities without batting an eye. Certainly not the animals, of which we have already extirpated many of the largest and most beautiful species. A land ethic of course cannot prevent the alteration, management, and use of these ‘resources,’ but it does affirm their right to continued existence, and, at least in spots, their continued existence in a natural state.” -
Aldo Leopold

i-am-the-lighthouse:

10andcounting:

So last night I watched an extremely disturbing documentary called the cove, here’s the description from the wiki page:

The Cove is a 2009 American documentary film that describes the annual killing of dolphins in a National Park at Taiji, Wakayama, in Japan from an anti–dolphin-hunting campaigner’s point of view.[3][4] The film highlights the fact that the number of dolphins killed in the Taiji dolphin hunting drive is several times greater than the number of whales killed in the Antarctic, and reports that 23,000 dolphins and porpoises are killed in Japan every year in the country’s whaling industry. The migrating dolphins are herded into a hidden cove where they are netted and killed by means of spears and knives over the side of small fishing boats.

It became clear as the film went on that the government were involved with these fishermen. Most lowly fishermen cannot afford a diving team to search under the waves to ensure nothing’s there, nor could they afford the high tech sound epuipment used to lure these poor creatures into the bay. The dolphin meat was also being used as school lunch meat, but hey wait that isn’t the most disturbing part yet!

The dolphin meat is highly contaminated with mercury, a highly toxic substance. Many years ago the documentary told of the town of Minamata, where mercury poising (or minamata disease as it was dubbed) claimed many people and caused many babies to be born deformed. E.G below.

Mercury attacks the brain. Slowly destroying neurones, meaning that those suffering slowly lose senses, control and receptivness. There was a particularly poignant part of the film where a man from the town is on a stage, crying profusely, telling of the woes of these children ‘being born that will never see, will never hear, never taste…’.

So unwittingly not only were these fishermen not just killing beautiful and intelligent animals, they were also poisoning the people of their town.

Back onto government cover ups, when in a meeting with many different countries it was interesting to note that many of the very poorest countries agreed with the killing of dolphins. Hm.

In the meeting many defended the continued killing by saying that ‘killing time had improved’ when infact these men were spearing and stabbing these dolphins with little to no regard.

THIS KILLING IS DISGUSTING AT THE VERY LEAST AND IS HARMING THEIR OWN PEOPLE TOO. PLEASE REBLOG. DONATE. ANYTHING.

You can find more on the website, dontate to the OPS here:

https://opsociety.worldsecuresystems.com/securedonation.htm

Write to leaders:

http://www.takepart.com/writetoourleaders

Or read about the documentary here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cove_%28film%29

thanks.

REBLOG REBLOG REBLOG